tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-86722882079457884022024-03-12T20:12:47.365-07:00Engine Out Flight ProcedureNeno Rusenohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04555009903444787356noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8672288207945788402.post-70683574814726792302014-09-30T01:43:00.000-07:002014-09-30T01:43:53.129-07:00OYSN RW18 One Engine Out Missed Approach<div style="text-align: justify;">
A few days ago, one of this blog follower asked me some questions on an one engine out missed approach. He gave an example of missed approach procedure of Sanaa Intl. airport ILS RW18. The chart is shown below. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjwcz2mQ44Q4lFsRfGghir5O8jaFHDVWSu1DlyG5xHMyK1pD9eO3unRRWp5kj7Lf_U-1gyQLr1RgcR0DbkVmpU5nbZRVAsKczeyHmPDkP85G_6DF6K0MJ4ScfnpiBqkBjaPN_MdQf-faJOB/s1600/ILS+RW18.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjwcz2mQ44Q4lFsRfGghir5O8jaFHDVWSu1DlyG5xHMyK1pD9eO3unRRWp5kj7Lf_U-1gyQLr1RgcR0DbkVmpU5nbZRVAsKczeyHmPDkP85G_6DF6K0MJ4ScfnpiBqkBjaPN_MdQf-faJOB/s1600/ILS+RW18.JPG" height="400" width="304" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I will simulate this missed approach procedure with one engine out in WinPEP using A320-231 aircraft. Calculation type is from any point in flight. The initial conditions and its screenshot are shown below.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<ul>
<li>Air Con: On, Anti Ice: Off</li>
<li>Engine level: average, thrust level: idle</li>
<li>Configuration: FULL</li>
<li>Weight: 66000 kg (MLW)</li>
<li>Altitude: 7665 ft (height of 500ft)</li>
<li>Speed: 150 KIAS</li>
<li>Direction: 179 deg</li>
<li>Landing gear: down</li>
<li>Engine out: 0</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEinmLVU6dkSTAdjY0jH2IKgKAB9COM-3zlvC7N_zY9uWfI08sBs1Oh_53D_Z4HVfFify1GGEwt6XdFXz65hlE6JuQBAb7EIbmOjf7vK3WnK1AUNEEFWsi2DJxU4rYQNa3QH37A6RMVge_Ia/s1600/Initial.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEinmLVU6dkSTAdjY0jH2IKgKAB9COM-3zlvC7N_zY9uWfI08sBs1Oh_53D_Z4HVfFify1GGEwt6XdFXz65hlE6JuQBAb7EIbmOjf7vK3WnK1AUNEEFWsi2DJxU4rYQNa3QH37A6RMVge_Ia/s1600/Initial.JPG" height="296" width="400" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The procedure consists of several flight segments and its first segment screenshoots are shown below:</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<ol>
<li>Landing gear change, thrust rating: go around, engines out: 1</li>
<li>Aero. conf. change: CONF 3</li>
<li>Aero. conf. change: CONF 2</li>
<li>Climb to QNH 8000 ft</li>
<li>Thrust rating: max continuous, acceleration to S speed</li>
<li>Aero. conf. change: CONF 1</li>
<li>Acceleration to Green Dot speed</li>
<li>Climb to QNH 15000 ft</li>
</ol>
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiBUHWSkfmIHiVXW_YE4WcjVv0YwMgybIO6ylU6hsYXEDKNlHB0LbyF3fRiD98kD7QATVFuAVKNX6tVvncNrG6KzEYOmUb5sKa1oZ96q1fnO4SxuT7lX8xU3sIMT7qcRGLO3x55_UgODsRY/s1600/Flight+segment.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiBUHWSkfmIHiVXW_YE4WcjVv0YwMgybIO6ylU6hsYXEDKNlHB0LbyF3fRiD98kD7QATVFuAVKNX6tVvncNrG6KzEYOmUb5sKa1oZ96q1fnO4SxuT7lX8xU3sIMT7qcRGLO3x55_UgODsRY/s1600/Flight+segment.JPG" height="300" width="400" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The procedure will start at SAA VOR as missed approach point, then climb to 8000 ft, at D4 SAA right turn to SAA VOR, then intercept R359 SAA to NIBAL waypoint. In this calculation type, the runway tab will be filled by SAA VOR information. This procedure will be tranlated into several ground track steps and its first step screenshot are shown below. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<ol>
<li>Fly heading 179 deg, portion end type: Turn to new Navaid SAA at DME 4 SAA, bank angle 20 deg.</li>
<li>Fly direct to Navaid SAA, portion end type: Turn to new Navaid NIBAL at DME 1.7 SAA, bank angle -15 deg.</li>
<li>Fly direct to Navaid NIBAL, portion end type: at Navaid.</li>
</ol>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjaQA4Q5sRDXRlOuxRjgePzDF-Udli0ZDdZvTmzoSTntLpyDPhyphenhyphenhtX0CVyMXXxcArjAQgCl2B9ereG8r7wU487koX6cQWV8HnqB3WmG1kfVJ_IDj_vITVBlrP9cMJ3k0dw5WybfjTO9Gwbp/s1600/Ground+track.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjaQA4Q5sRDXRlOuxRjgePzDF-Udli0ZDdZvTmzoSTntLpyDPhyphenhyphenhtX0CVyMXXxcArjAQgCl2B9ereG8r7wU487koX6cQWV8HnqB3WmG1kfVJ_IDj_vITVBlrP9cMJ3k0dw5WybfjTO9Gwbp/s1600/Ground+track.JPG" height="296" width="400" /></a></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Note: we need to key in coordinates of SAA and NIBAL in Navaids definition as shown in screenshoot below.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhR-azBMeFbypwr583SgmhSxgfqRNG-vrT0lmh2T4Ntoh76ZkKMvFBkFjiKpJeBjJJNBaYXDjjvL1NzzxLBKC1QI3SLVCEbhxZSsa7QhtnxwCOScpWbdUkwXFMXxw5dJvNRxkJTFhN1_xi6/s1600/Navaid.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhR-azBMeFbypwr583SgmhSxgfqRNG-vrT0lmh2T4Ntoh76ZkKMvFBkFjiKpJeBjJJNBaYXDjjvL1NzzxLBKC1QI3SLVCEbhxZSsa7QhtnxwCOScpWbdUkwXFMXxw5dJvNRxkJTFhN1_xi6/s1600/Navaid.JPG" height="165" width="400" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The WinPEP result is shown below. The altitude of 8000 ft is reached at point DME 4 SAA as shown in the second picture.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgte4g8qxn__bjNGuKoFJx8PTz2qeirn66r19H24cngPonuLJschlwm8K2cxCeg4NpU6o2pvfdrfn-sCsO6Z1FWGe6OoHtmahjbhUeyOYI8osfAj8KXWcp6edt6kKuKIej0CiqqVl1RzCy5/s1600/result2.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgte4g8qxn__bjNGuKoFJx8PTz2qeirn66r19H24cngPonuLJschlwm8K2cxCeg4NpU6o2pvfdrfn-sCsO6Z1FWGe6OoHtmahjbhUeyOYI8osfAj8KXWcp6edt6kKuKIej0CiqqVl1RzCy5/s1600/result2.JPG" height="400" width="281" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj_UrYEPoK1EzhvL864vwL8trnWa0gha6keW9eMunMPZmtJCrHP7VRuqRCqSt7lzVBfWP15RNhGLU7p7dsCXJpo3ErJ4nV1U4IgEc0HW1d94eCP80sbcU-u1MqtCpFOubLfhVdmSaHcaArl/s1600/result1.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj_UrYEPoK1EzhvL864vwL8trnWa0gha6keW9eMunMPZmtJCrHP7VRuqRCqSt7lzVBfWP15RNhGLU7p7dsCXJpo3ErJ4nV1U4IgEc0HW1d94eCP80sbcU-u1MqtCpFOubLfhVdmSaHcaArl/s1600/result1.JPG" height="400" width="175" /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: justify;">
I used the result from WinPEP to be analyzed in my EOSID applicaiton inside MATLAB. The resulted 2D and 3D view of terrain and flight procedure are shown below.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiuMIf3m6GYC_yUf-OmMgWjVO7xmbUh7syLz9xWQCFOW5jJ_UFFvAHs0egJSMZgFyZhFFPredBDTXhGn9iDnM97zIwUXWVOLstU_rIlxTE4agaL5UPk_Jog54UuYsUdeSTG4p824gyaM9qs/s1600/2D+graph.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiuMIf3m6GYC_yUf-OmMgWjVO7xmbUh7syLz9xWQCFOW5jJ_UFFvAHs0egJSMZgFyZhFFPredBDTXhGn9iDnM97zIwUXWVOLstU_rIlxTE4agaL5UPk_Jog54UuYsUdeSTG4p824gyaM9qs/s1600/2D+graph.JPG" height="400" width="243" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhmKvhwmxyxhXjvpdQnyfqmnCerR5dkvPS20LBK2pI7IhFLJecrfeMhHYqGyQTREUhJ2w_FdaVnYM0Q24dawbnItSSQoUUO6kWM9iT-GQqwZJjiu6gCEY6Q3pCn-TFhT12p_6zIDWg2peiW/s1600/3D+graph.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhmKvhwmxyxhXjvpdQnyfqmnCerR5dkvPS20LBK2pI7IhFLJecrfeMhHYqGyQTREUhJ2w_FdaVnYM0Q24dawbnItSSQoUUO6kWM9iT-GQqwZJjiu6gCEY6Q3pCn-TFhT12p_6zIDWg2peiW/s1600/3D+graph.JPG" height="287" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The significant terrains along the procedure is shown in graph and table below after considering the loss of gradient during a turn. The most significat terrain is the one around distance of 3.2 km with climb gradient of 0.75%. Since the most significant terrain is below 2.5% climb gradient, this missed approach procedure does not required a special one engine out procedure.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh-a1zLMzb1M5c0Y4C1VlLADvJa9jEikHtXkOC-XAGS_-i4y8DaY8zaMvT8M_Uhc98nk9nRjkrlbjJYrlweEswCYsUC_fci14QrXAiJTL4u6KC0NkphBMbaVeugRrqQMSJ0ZQsUTxXNfIvM/s1600/terrain+graph.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh-a1zLMzb1M5c0Y4C1VlLADvJa9jEikHtXkOC-XAGS_-i4y8DaY8zaMvT8M_Uhc98nk9nRjkrlbjJYrlweEswCYsUC_fci14QrXAiJTL4u6KC0NkphBMbaVeugRrqQMSJ0ZQsUTxXNfIvM/s1600/terrain+graph.JPG" height="80" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiKKcA8u-UaGyDbacRgwdal7RKSnfKIAf4jA7IsFgdVuQqxBZoS62sdCiDeqb0XERCqGFwqcHdledeNhJZGqnS38O8E5HqQlXwd-hMIU1ufx6McKBXd9uyHcLTvpOlYp5sfDIn6_R0nYCjR/s1600/terrain+table.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiKKcA8u-UaGyDbacRgwdal7RKSnfKIAf4jA7IsFgdVuQqxBZoS62sdCiDeqb0XERCqGFwqcHdledeNhJZGqnS38O8E5HqQlXwd-hMIU1ufx6McKBXd9uyHcLTvpOlYp5sfDIn6_R0nYCjR/s1600/terrain+table.JPG" height="320" width="275" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The visualization of this procedure can be viewed in Google earth by downloading <a href="http://www.4shared.com/file/kXgsGSy8ba/EO_MissApp_for_OYSN_runway_18.html?">this kml</a> files (you can use the same <a href="http://www.4shared.com/file/Lx-u8BIZba/A320.html?">aircrat model</a> as in SLTJ EOSID sample). Some screenshots of flight are shown below. The green circles are flight path markers. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiXJ4brF02v9eCgkYbSISZFPpHpOCunNDQKqSDkD_dxMjg4qqq_Nx6EenWy22RrNtg-ALNMr_tbtP5X1L-ZcsDFBB0O21yIjpFzpUWtqcIFfiblZW2l5bJSWUwvQhyUT6oEamUleK2f00Gd/s1600/vis1.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiXJ4brF02v9eCgkYbSISZFPpHpOCunNDQKqSDkD_dxMjg4qqq_Nx6EenWy22RrNtg-ALNMr_tbtP5X1L-ZcsDFBB0O21yIjpFzpUWtqcIFfiblZW2l5bJSWUwvQhyUT6oEamUleK2f00Gd/s1600/vis1.JPG" height="243" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh7KgRHGdmNgmFXyIbsOmMLDvfUUPYWlW_5l6y_3MOLV2iN9-njoRB_8uT8ctnlR5NBI0ivPwlxdl-W2O9Xbu8qbC0JPUeVUN-VSKHsqx4dWMZihyphenhyphenM0gBf9ALZjfOKx3mYTblgHp7Pf7o6c/s1600/vis2.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh7KgRHGdmNgmFXyIbsOmMLDvfUUPYWlW_5l6y_3MOLV2iN9-njoRB_8uT8ctnlR5NBI0ivPwlxdl-W2O9Xbu8qbC0JPUeVUN-VSKHsqx4dWMZihyphenhyphenM0gBf9ALZjfOKx3mYTblgHp7Pf7o6c/s1600/vis2.JPG" height="245" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg-qVUcfHagak2sSxK2GmsyyM9Ufj0cz2kXWXxsW6idUw3_XshP9iYbCHiRGp1xgTdCQdUX8eQaTqez_yoJYHNZso4wKGVJgy2gaasWCCyiCR5UejsrspGBcbEolotodlUOPE4OUTvnDEJV/s1600/vis3.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg-qVUcfHagak2sSxK2GmsyyM9Ufj0cz2kXWXxsW6idUw3_XshP9iYbCHiRGp1xgTdCQdUX8eQaTqez_yoJYHNZso4wKGVJgy2gaasWCCyiCR5UejsrspGBcbEolotodlUOPE4OUTvnDEJV/s1600/vis3.JPG" height="255" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh76I_zajh33ZP5G1a30opR7iaIquepcmRa84KGv1W9s6OjjvMoz7z6SyElL9eV_SD2441P7TSNr1bdZphKXn66450HD1-nJLOmnhs4rcDCDiMb6ca_3icU1f2z6Mnb2W3QYORbNhWsOJZy/s1600/vis4.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh76I_zajh33ZP5G1a30opR7iaIquepcmRa84KGv1W9s6OjjvMoz7z6SyElL9eV_SD2441P7TSNr1bdZphKXn66450HD1-nJLOmnhs4rcDCDiMb6ca_3icU1f2z6Mnb2W3QYORbNhWsOJZy/s1600/vis4.JPG" height="268" width="400" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
If you have feedback or something to discuss, please do not hesitate to contact me by <a href="mailto:neno_r@yahoo.com">email</a>! </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
--o0o--</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
Neno Rusenohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04555009903444787356noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8672288207945788402.post-42338630132672224182014-09-25T23:28:00.000-07:002014-09-25T23:29:42.339-07:00One Engine Out Missed Approaches Design<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b>I Introduction </b></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b><br /></b></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Generally any multi-engine aircraft IFR capable, flying under IMC conditions with all engine performance can meet gradient capabilities published in missed approaches. Missed approach procedures are generally divided into the initial, intermediate and the final phase. Obstacle clearance requirements begin in the intermediate phase with a 30 metre (98 feet) clearance requirement. In the final phase, the obstacle clearance requirement becomes 50 metres (164 feet). The nominal climb gradient of a missed approach surface is 2.5%, however higher gradients may be required where obstacle clearance dictates. For older aircraft, particularly piston engined, aircraft compliance with the published missed approach may not be achievable when operating at or near the maximum certificated weight, high altitudes, high temperatures and engine out conditions. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhOsIZ_Uz7CnjKFo754jr2C4Boy3D1SVTETkQvk7a49Jkfc4mV1UOjd8fLh7T3f7E8zZeRGoTxi6J9asS9myq2QIHr5ZTrMGM0GrBs4IXHI1kavYlRv9kXpk5-N78JLygjiok8PUeO4ZiQm/s1600/missed+approach+phases.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhOsIZ_Uz7CnjKFo754jr2C4Boy3D1SVTETkQvk7a49Jkfc4mV1UOjd8fLh7T3f7E8zZeRGoTxi6J9asS9myq2QIHr5ZTrMGM0GrBs4IXHI1kavYlRv9kXpk5-N78JLygjiok8PUeO4ZiQm/s1600/missed+approach+phases.JPG" height="168" width="400" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<i>Note: It is the responsibility of the operator to ensure that the aircraft does not conduct an approach at a weight and/or temperature that would not permit the aircraft to comply with the published missed approach procedure under normal “all engine” operational conditions. However under “engine out” emergency conditions compliance with the published missed approach procedures are not required. </i></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b>II Regulatory Requirements </b></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b><br /></b></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
For aircraft operating above 5700 kg and in accordance with CASA CAO 20.7.1B, operators must comply with paragraph 14 of the order for the development of takeoff performance data and procedures. Sub-paragraph 14.2, states: </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<i>“ Procedures to be followed consistent with this Order, including procedures anticipating engine failure at any time between the commencement of take-off and completion of landing, must be specified in the Operator’s Operation Manual. The procedures so specified must be such that they can be consistently executed in service by flight crews of average skill and they must also be such that the take-off flight path with all engines operating is above the one-engine inoperative take-off flight path.” </i></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
As stated above, procedures anticipating engine failure at any time between the commencement of takeoff and completion of landing must be specified. This includes missed approaches with an engine out. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
More specifically CAO 20.7.1B Paragraph 5.1(b) specifies that the landing weight of the aircraft must be reduced to meet amongst other things, the approach climb requirements in Paragraph 9. The approach climb performance requirements in Paragraph 9 stipulates that a gross gradient of 2.1% for twin-engine aircraft, 2.3% for three engine aircraft and 2.4% for four engine aircraft must be available for engine out performance. This is obviously the minimum climb certification requirement and is not related to any published missed approach procedures. Paragraph 12 makes reference to obstacle clearance however, it is limited to the context of takeoff and enroute. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b>III Guidance </b></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Operators should develop engine out missed approach guidance for all instrument approach procedures where the aircraft would not be able to comply with the climb gradient performance requirements of the normal published missed approach procedures with an engine out. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
It is the responsibility of the operator to ensure that, for any engine out missed approach procedures developed for use within their operation, sufficient aircraft performance studies have been developed to verify that the procedure provides adequate obstacle clearance throughout the flight path. When developing engine out missed approach procedures, operators may be limited to flight paths that would only allow for obstacle avoidance until sufficient altitude is achieved to land at the airport or fly to an alternate airport as required by the type of emergency.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The intent is to identify the best option or options for a safe lateral ground track and flight path to follow in the event that a missed approach or balked landing go-around is necessary with an engine out. To accomplish this, the operator may develop the methods and criteria for the analysis of engine-out procedures which best reflect that operator's operational procedures. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Specific Engine Out Missed Approach Procedures may be designed when compliance with the published missed approach procedure cannot be achieved during engine out operations. <u>An alternative option to designing an engine out missed approach procedure may be, to use an existing EOSID for the nominated runway. </u></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<i>Note: If an operator chooses to use an EOSID in lieu of a published missed approach path, they must first demonstrate that the aircraft has the navigational capability to overfly the landing threshold, track runway centreline and overfly the runway end within the initial splay tolerance. Depending upon the operation type, the splay width can vary between 90 and 150 metres. Furthermore, the aircraft system and navigational capability needs to be assessed to ensure that the aircraft can be flown to the required tolerance in IMC and crew procedures must be in place to adequately address this manoeuvre. </i></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In the absence of an Engine Out Missed Approach Procedure, the following provides sample methods of ensuring that obstacle clearance is maintained during an engine out missed approach. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
1. Limit the approach climb weight and thus the landing weight such that the aircraft can comply with the published gradient (2.5% and above) at the operating minima with an engine out. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
2. Limit the operating minima to a height where the missed approach equivalent gradient capability is assured at the typical mission landing weight. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh1cztcCLQubyMKCrWhfSEOS2yjhwF6KpE1Yi2lpMcb10LSX9qccaefSBPnM8LfXoAh4UeWSyDgkd1aQKVAK5tdyfckFnP9ZZJ_pkXy3dbAdSisahjZqDd1IKZUJpiMYgKWKdckp69oRrnP/s1600/missed+approach+minima.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh1cztcCLQubyMKCrWhfSEOS2yjhwF6KpE1Yi2lpMcb10LSX9qccaefSBPnM8LfXoAh4UeWSyDgkd1aQKVAK5tdyfckFnP9ZZJ_pkXy3dbAdSisahjZqDd1IKZUJpiMYgKWKdckp69oRrnP/s1600/missed+approach+minima.JPG" height="135" width="400" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
3. In the diagram above, if the aircraft cannot comply with a 7.0% climb gradient engine out, the operator may choose a higher minima to enable a lower and compliable climb gradient. Some published procedures frequently provide alternate minima to accommodate different aircraft performance. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b>IV Missed Approach Procedure Assessment Considerations </b></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b><br /></b></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Operators may accomplish such assessments generically for a particular runway, procedure, aircraft type, and expected performance, and need not perform this assessment for each specific flight. Operators may use simplifying assumptions to account for the transition, reconfiguration and acceleration distances following go-around (e.g., use expected landing weights, anticipated landing flap settings). </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The operator should use the best available information or methods from applicable aircraft manuals or supplementary information from aircraft or engine manufacturers. If performance or flight path data are not otherwise available to support the necessary analysis from the above sources, the operator may develop, compute, demonstrate or determine such information to the extent necessary to provide for safe obstacle clearance. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The operational considerations should include: </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
1. Go-around configuration transitions from approach to missed approach configuration including expected flap settings and flap retraction procedures. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
2. Expected speed changes. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
3. Appropriate engine failure and shutdown (feathering if applicable) provisions, if the approach was assumed to be initiated with all engines operative. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
4. Any lateral differences of the missed approach flight path from the corresponding takeoff flight path. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
5. Suitable balked landing obstacle clearance, until reaching instrument approach missed approach or </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
enroute procedurally protected airspace. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
6. Any performance or gradient loss during turning flight </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
7. Methods used for takeoff analysis, engine-out maximum angle climb, or other such techniques. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
8. Operators may make obstacle clearance assumptions similar to those applied to corresponding takeoff flight paths in the determination of net vertical flight path clearance or lateral track obstacle clearance. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<i>Source: CAAP 235-4(0), Guidelines for the Consideration and Design of: Engine Out SID (EOSID) </i></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<i>and Engine Out Missed Approach Procedures, Australian CASA, November 2006.</i></div>
Neno Rusenohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04555009903444787356noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8672288207945788402.post-88784555186111081172013-06-17T01:52:00.001-07:002014-09-17T01:58:04.848-07:00EOSID for SLTJ RWY 13<div align="JUSTIFY">
SLTJ is located in Bolivia-South America at coordinates of S21 33 21 and W064 42
05 in a mountanious area sorrounded by high terrains as shown in
Figure 1. The area is surrounded by high mountains with several
valleys.
</div>
<div align="JUSTIFY">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjRS0ttrxic7C8E2fVE34IrhQ3-1xJxqX6ne8N4edDVlxNDeukxmi5m-yDieRbsugnwjRdAdcVKOovY5b-_sPA-Z2yQTlwjE1MNZlA6CBpQnS24FTRDdGSORC1ZdmXH1CoFTA61JFRZalOF/s1600/SLTJ+airport.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjRS0ttrxic7C8E2fVE34IrhQ3-1xJxqX6ne8N4edDVlxNDeukxmi5m-yDieRbsugnwjRdAdcVKOovY5b-_sPA-Z2yQTlwjE1MNZlA6CBpQnS24FTRDdGSORC1ZdmXH1CoFTA61JFRZalOF/s1600/SLTJ+airport.JPG" /></a></div>
<div align="CENTER" style="margin-top: 0.08in;">
<span style="font-size: small;"><i>Figure 1.
3D view of SLTJ airport surrounding area.</i></span></div>
<div align="CENTER" style="margin-top: 0.08in;">
<span style="font-size: small;"><i><br /></i></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY">
Normally for this type of airport, tt's RTOW (regulated takeoff weight) is very
limited. For this analysis we will use an A320 aircraft. The RTOW for straight out departure is shown in Table 1.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhTeqnVqDagM0K5xBNR1SGnqrOxObc6Ed1Sjt-d301-hrCqHAknO_t995rUkl03XC_jXyH1dKFJb44_ZhubgzWc5FmRF2ut3fMM8A5thxAFxwbhh7b9A4eFrFvAeJ9BYyqPLLYU2I5kgYKE/s1600/RTOW+A320+SLTJ+RW13.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhTeqnVqDagM0K5xBNR1SGnqrOxObc6Ed1Sjt-d301-hrCqHAknO_t995rUkl03XC_jXyH1dKFJb44_ZhubgzWc5FmRF2ut3fMM8A5thxAFxwbhh7b9A4eFrFvAeJ9BYyqPLLYU2I5kgYKE/s400/RTOW+A320+SLTJ+RW13.JPG" height="253" width="400" /></a></div>
<div align="CENTER" style="margin-top: 0.08in;">
<span style="font-size: small;"><i>Table 1. The A320 RTOW for straight out takeoff .</i></span></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
The manufacture MTOW for this aircraft is around 78 ton, but RTOW chart shown that for Conf 2, 20 deg C and 0 wind the aircraft MTOW is 55.2 ton. In order to ease this
limitation, an EOSID is required to increase the RTOW.</div>
<div align="JUSTIFY">
<br /></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY">
We designed an EOSID based on a guideline from AC
120-91 from FAA and CAAP 235-4(0) from CASA Australia. Since there is a mountain ahead of runway 13, we designed a procedure which climb to certain altitude then it turns back to TAR VOR. We also decided to end the procedure at the holding at TAR VOR which later on pilot can choose between back to land or continue to enroute. But the aircraft need to gain the holding altitude, thus we add in climb procedure to north of airport and turn back to join the holding.<br />
<br />
The proposed EOSID for runway 13 is "<b>Climb
at runway heading. At D2 TAR turn LEFT 15 degree bank to mag track
095 degree. At D6 TAR turn RIGHT max 20 degree bank remain within D10
TAR direct to TAR. At TAR turn LEFT intercept R010 TAR. At D6 TAR
turn LEFT max 20 degree bank remain within D10 TAR to join TAR
holding climb to 18,000 ft. (RIGHT turn, 180 degree inbound, 1.5
minutes leg)</b>" as shown in Figure 2 and 3.</div>
<div align="JUSTIFY">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhW6gA3DHfw9HysrKViqnFV05ab2lR6VLQ9YoDqif5IHLETW2OsKTJOkLFW7XPn7Zdc6X-31MlsTe9EhaotSaTuqKrbjo1hw9hS6pyJ7DTPf23a7LnRn-1ErXUDcTl6EA8_-7n4J2XppwxC/s1600/SLTJ+RW13+2D+eosid.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhW6gA3DHfw9HysrKViqnFV05ab2lR6VLQ9YoDqif5IHLETW2OsKTJOkLFW7XPn7Zdc6X-31MlsTe9EhaotSaTuqKrbjo1hw9hS6pyJ7DTPf23a7LnRn-1ErXUDcTl6EA8_-7n4J2XppwxC/s400/SLTJ+RW13+2D+eosid.JPG" height="370" width="400" /></a></div>
<div align="CENTER" style="margin-top: 0.08in;">
<span style="font-size: small;"><i>Figure 2. The 2D view of the EOSID.</i></span></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhfsrh4ZPlipqyYqiuSfCsGqKBzMhHQHdiADmUMlRIR7Tu1iJ0DskAPNOR6c25pC-XWj3mP68NDaQSiwBOsJeye9_X4fTF26ecCl5X0K3713f132CbUqejgUjHDg20jtLyYDJBgxYdZ355y/s1600/SLTJ+RW13+3D+eosid.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhfsrh4ZPlipqyYqiuSfCsGqKBzMhHQHdiADmUMlRIR7Tu1iJ0DskAPNOR6c25pC-XWj3mP68NDaQSiwBOsJeye9_X4fTF26ecCl5X0K3713f132CbUqejgUjHDg20jtLyYDJBgxYdZ355y/s400/SLTJ+RW13+3D+eosid.JPG" height="243" width="400" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<i>Figure 3. The 3D view of the EOSID.</i></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<i><br /></i></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY">
The terrain considered along the EOSID flight path
is shown in Figure 4 and tabulated in Table 2. Distance and height
are refered to the beginning of runway. Correction height is applied
due to loss of gradient during a turn.</div>
<div align="JUSTIFY">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh-AzjTej4U5dIi9v-xdBzhafvch8IfN40qGoifDogz4I6SOLap_cVDn_Txt-ITgKCx6rJDGY4vepWVoXqrCAyJ5m_28tkYvnSnW1gofU7QQr7_0BTeP_VEx_BFmNnbfZF49UvcxWhnmQHS/s1600/SLTJ+RW13+eosid+terrain.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh-AzjTej4U5dIi9v-xdBzhafvch8IfN40qGoifDogz4I6SOLap_cVDn_Txt-ITgKCx6rJDGY4vepWVoXqrCAyJ5m_28tkYvnSnW1gofU7QQr7_0BTeP_VEx_BFmNnbfZF49UvcxWhnmQHS/s400/SLTJ+RW13+eosid+terrain.JPG" height="96" width="400" /></a></div>
</div>
<div style="text-align: right;">
<div align="CENTER" style="margin-top: 0.08in;">
<span style="font-size: small;"><i>Figure 4. Terrain along the EOSID.</i></span></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhLad-0kE7c4z5egcaVquscmeN9zIsYXZYfsSyUHMZU7gm5voVf_wOyEdlu4btcBBB8MX4EQx1Cj4o0wbWdumLEVKELWMFpwBi7xuGgPdbm-dS8WpIP-BdbgL8ULMVz7c_asLPpJIYeFKns/s1600/SLTJ+RW13+terrain+table.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhLad-0kE7c4z5egcaVquscmeN9zIsYXZYfsSyUHMZU7gm5voVf_wOyEdlu4btcBBB8MX4EQx1Cj4o0wbWdumLEVKELWMFpwBi7xuGgPdbm-dS8WpIP-BdbgL8ULMVz7c_asLPpJIYeFKns/s400/SLTJ+RW13+terrain+table.JPG" height="75" width="400" /></a></div>
<i>Table 2. Significant terrain along the EOSID.</i><br />
<div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The resulted RTOW of an A320 aircraft with the EOSID procedure is shown in Table 3. The MTOW is increased significantly to 65.4 ton.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEieTkNv7J5fRYhqAbICBlXDCHfUPCN_9zFxSpAc8k3GN7HjKOdCciPUV-8GvdTpqdX9edzBd6lLnqel_wSn91EFY35T69wcbM_loKC1TUw_N7f06-P8HRU4R2GQgPC32ffitUuCXlxTMiu-/s1600/RTOW+A320+SLTJ+RW13+EO.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEieTkNv7J5fRYhqAbICBlXDCHfUPCN_9zFxSpAc8k3GN7HjKOdCciPUV-8GvdTpqdX9edzBd6lLnqel_wSn91EFY35T69wcbM_loKC1TUw_N7f06-P8HRU4R2GQgPC32ffitUuCXlxTMiu-/s400/RTOW+A320+SLTJ+RW13+EO.JPG" height="228" width="400" /></a></div>
<div align="CENTER" style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; color: black; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; margin-top: 0.08in; orphans: auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
<div style="margin: 0px;">
<span style="font-size: small;"><i>Table 3. The A320 RTOW for the EOSID takeoff .</i></span></div>
<div style="margin: 0px;">
<span style="font-size: small;"><i><br /></i></span></div>
<div style="margin: 0px; text-align: justify;">
Visualization of this EOSID can be downloaded <a href="http://www.4shared.com/file/hdKmLvWnce/EOSID_for_SLTJ_runway_13.html">here</a>. It is required to download the aircraft model <a href="http://www.4shared.com/file/Lx-u8BIZba/A320.html">here</a> and put all in one folder. It is in a kml format and can be viewed in google earth. It consists of multiple views. Some screenshots can be viewed below! Enjoy!!!</div>
<div style="margin: 0px; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgkyepQH9rC0lvSPomOJLKs0Gb6k51aWjp_6_0Md-WEDohFFTbWwIo1mwrFo-7oZbRMksT0Z0uc1jEu_HSpWuj8_DxFTZuE1Ifrtr4QIbcsVVxytkgqlh-79JBm3ziuSEkV0Cnpt3ArhlE1/s1600/slltj1.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgkyepQH9rC0lvSPomOJLKs0Gb6k51aWjp_6_0Md-WEDohFFTbWwIo1mwrFo-7oZbRMksT0Z0uc1jEu_HSpWuj8_DxFTZuE1Ifrtr4QIbcsVVxytkgqlh-79JBm3ziuSEkV0Cnpt3ArhlE1/s1600/slltj1.JPG" height="207" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg9GBKUzLpxLSn6SKIzh4o0W2XxzBR44xzrfnZW8KuSqzsMdVjzy2CCZGGHIkLpAzHLkjQBbmnhKSbQokSADi0t950PqNp54Ywvyg4yjihnnrZEiSC6KM2zYrOwyCcv1Mx5pVzO6L1EX6Bv/s1600/sltj5.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg9GBKUzLpxLSn6SKIzh4o0W2XxzBR44xzrfnZW8KuSqzsMdVjzy2CCZGGHIkLpAzHLkjQBbmnhKSbQokSADi0t950PqNp54Ywvyg4yjihnnrZEiSC6KM2zYrOwyCcv1Mx5pVzO6L1EX6Bv/s1600/sltj5.JPG" height="241" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEifYGX7QwUMyfnHnvIaF2EjwNxvT1Tf3I6sPQLQrVPTpu0q8CbaNH2dNGtMQBVsRrly9kq9WCv3f-CiOmHHkY1bL7tUnt8zOwwpbWFAfr6gyRaKmrHXKV5aSAD5G2RxXijzZ3kbESX5ZKJl/s1600/sltj2.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEifYGX7QwUMyfnHnvIaF2EjwNxvT1Tf3I6sPQLQrVPTpu0q8CbaNH2dNGtMQBVsRrly9kq9WCv3f-CiOmHHkY1bL7tUnt8zOwwpbWFAfr6gyRaKmrHXKV5aSAD5G2RxXijzZ3kbESX5ZKJl/s1600/sltj2.JPG" height="251" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhu84eEH4Vj4wRXWyPPfBUqhNr0PhZsbfOOYCBk5ziy4kEOoyiCa03sGCIAKTkWo0O00BypaS1DhvlOqdzR-56IeLxpCQV1uyn9CFQ9bnlKRW_2-QjsEQfzc96ptEHNuicGJP_0MbLpN_bX/s1600/sltj3.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhu84eEH4Vj4wRXWyPPfBUqhNr0PhZsbfOOYCBk5ziy4kEOoyiCa03sGCIAKTkWo0O00BypaS1DhvlOqdzR-56IeLxpCQV1uyn9CFQ9bnlKRW_2-QjsEQfzc96ptEHNuicGJP_0MbLpN_bX/s1600/sltj3.JPG" height="232" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh-uaHxc8BpzUvh8uEY00QJ1W52ketjq13HnWKVW2Jz7Cda9snOlXR3kTv4qRovDxaznFniRHN5dr0v61wmbBv1us8onyKjKCLkVt98RRjtN5-X99UCi24N64i_4MP88XQa9F3ywpgXHtGS/s1600/sltj4.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh-uaHxc8BpzUvh8uEY00QJ1W52ketjq13HnWKVW2Jz7Cda9snOlXR3kTv4qRovDxaznFniRHN5dr0v61wmbBv1us8onyKjKCLkVt98RRjtN5-X99UCi24N64i_4MP88XQa9F3ywpgXHtGS/s1600/sltj4.JPG" height="246" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhYTREK9K6wY5_L9pcyXQQy7uXQsUgYqpccMgW5MQl72mccTHuWlzRwm3qU7g8QDxl8t5LU4-oWOCakZDtWpIirrhVOQdiiho8DVnpQb99X2R8khNSZp0oaG_KMbGBzuX97hPZP3v0ctpbM/s1600/SLTJ+RW13+3D+eosid+google+earth.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhYTREK9K6wY5_L9pcyXQQy7uXQsUgYqpccMgW5MQl72mccTHuWlzRwm3qU7g8QDxl8t5LU4-oWOCakZDtWpIirrhVOQdiiho8DVnpQb99X2R8khNSZp0oaG_KMbGBzuX97hPZP3v0ctpbM/s400/SLTJ+RW13+3D+eosid+google+earth.JPG" height="293" width="400" /></a></div>
<div style="margin: 0px; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin: 0px; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
</div>
-o0o-</div>
</div>
</div>
Neno Rusenohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04555009903444787356noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8672288207945788402.post-59929514435859080862012-09-11T23:11:00.001-07:002012-09-11T23:11:34.932-07:00EOSID for OEMA - MADINAH / Prince Mohammad Bin Abdulaziz international Airport<span style="background-color: white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.200000762939453px;">OEMA is a regional airport in the western Saudi city of</span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.200000762939453px;"> </span><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medina" style="background-image: none; color: #0b0080; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.200000762939453px; text-decoration: none;" title="Medina">Medina</a><span style="background-color: white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.200000762939453px;">. Opened in 1974, it handles mostly domestic flights, although it has limited scheduled international services to regional destinations such as</span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.200000762939453px;"> </span><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cairo" style="background-image: none; color: #0b0080; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.200000762939453px; text-decoration: none;" title="Cairo">Cairo</a><span style="background-color: white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.200000762939453px;">,</span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.200000762939453px;"> </span><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doha" style="background-image: none; color: #0b0080; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.200000762939453px; text-decoration: none;" title="Doha">Doha</a><span style="background-color: white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.200000762939453px;">,</span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.200000762939453px;"> </span><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dubai" style="background-image: none; color: #0b0080; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.200000762939453px; text-decoration: none;" title="Dubai">Dubai</a><span style="background-color: white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.200000762939453px;">,</span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.200000762939453px;"> </span><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Istanbul" style="background-image: none; color: #0b0080; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.200000762939453px; text-decoration: none;" title="Istanbul">Istanbul</a><span style="background-color: white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.200000762939453px;"> </span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.200000762939453px;">and</span><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kuwait" style="background-image: none; color: #0b0080; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.200000762939453px; text-decoration: none;" title="Kuwait">Kuwait</a><span style="background-color: white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.200000762939453px;">. and It also handles charter international flights during the</span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.200000762939453px;"> </span><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hajj" style="background-image: none; color: #0b0080; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.200000762939453px; text-decoration: none;" title="Hajj">Hajj</a><span style="background-color: white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.200000762939453px;"> </span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.200000762939453px;">season. It was named after</span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.200000762939453px;"> </span><a class="mw-redirect" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad_bin_Abdul-Aziz_Al_Saud" style="background-image: none; color: #0b0080; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.200000762939453px; text-decoration: none;" title="Muhammad bin Abdul-Aziz Al Saud">Muhammad bin Abdul-Aziz Al Saud</a><span style="background-color: white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.200000762939453px;">. Only Muslims are allowed to enter the city. This is a strictly enforced law. The Pilgrims for Hajj and Umrah can enter Saudi Arabia through this airport or through Jeddah airport only.</span><br />
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.200000762939453px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; margin-top: 0.4em;">
It is the fourth busiest airport in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saudi_Arabia" style="background-image: none; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; color: #0b0080; text-decoration: none;" title="Saudi Arabia">Saudi Arabia</a>, handling 1,592,000 passengers in 2004, including 378,715 Hajj charter passengers. On average, it handles 20-35 flights per day, although this number triples during the Hajj season and school holidays. [www.wikipedia.org]</div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.200000762939453px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; margin-top: 0.4em;">
OEMA has two runways: 17/35 and 18/36 with a mountaineous area on northern side. According to AIP, only runway 35 has a significant obstacle on its takeoff path. It is a mountain with elevation of 2812 ft above sea level. The Type A - Aerodrome Chart for runway 35 is shown below.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.200000762939453px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; margin-top: 0.4em;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhKqHHt3CFfu2XuNEOqNX8w4YYZhyeJ-g20w8dMs0Pd1ZKNdVdh85_1RlWxtCxutDc2z48rdIRcKbw8BsJwzRB1JjgLaDsfmrFec-gK3q4xxNFoEecFNvg2sGt2GjQuHbkGP3BhCjjX8yHG/s1600/OEMA+Type+A+chart+RW35.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="281" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhKqHHt3CFfu2XuNEOqNX8w4YYZhyeJ-g20w8dMs0Pd1ZKNdVdh85_1RlWxtCxutDc2z48rdIRcKbw8BsJwzRB1JjgLaDsfmrFec-gK3q4xxNFoEecFNvg2sGt2GjQuHbkGP3BhCjjX8yHG/s400/OEMA+Type+A+chart+RW35.JPG" width="400" /></a></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.200000762939453px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; margin-top: 0.4em;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.200000762939453px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; margin-top: 0.4em;">
For the purpose of this analysis we will use an Airbus A330-343 aircraft with MTOW of 233 ton. Considering the above obstacle, the RTOW resulted has an MTOW of 227.3 ton for dry runway condition with takeoff configuration of 1+F, aircon ON, anti-ice OFF, QNH 1013.25 hPa, and wind 0 kt. The 5.7 ton difference is due to an obstacle limitation as shown in the RTOW below.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEicMMpQzGQuq_3ynvLzPNzT7FB_VDxtl63h7p00Ag48PSjB1k6MKpdvAj1WC5RdEK31yeGbKadIEDrR_sYM8WkMELyz8tpcjcMFchECjXWckiFbPF0w27MsPhPVJ_ZeEOelVew2wbs98V47/s1600/OEMA+RTOW+RW35.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="210" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEicMMpQzGQuq_3ynvLzPNzT7FB_VDxtl63h7p00Ag48PSjB1k6MKpdvAj1WC5RdEK31yeGbKadIEDrR_sYM8WkMELyz8tpcjcMFchECjXWckiFbPF0w27MsPhPVJ_ZeEOelVew2wbs98V47/s400/OEMA+RTOW+RW35.JPG" width="400" /></a></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.200000762939453px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; margin-top: 0.4em;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.200000762939453px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; margin-top: 0.4em;">
Thus we need to design an EOSID to avoid this obstacle to increase the MTOW. Since the mountaineous area lies on northern side, we will design an EOSID which turns to the south and ends at ETNAM holding point. The full EOSID procedure text is "Climb STRAIGHT ahead at V2. At D3 PMA turn RIGHT with V2 and max 15 deg bank angle to heading 225 deg. Intercept R-188 PMA outbound to ETNAM and hold as required." The planview of EOSID overlays a contour chart is shown below.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgA0ZQnrVz_IcCQgWeOmXMchOazycGcb9OIawnbCThMuw139mqlrUGnOkgfRJSy0pJPtEALgNKCSo5bDgn54MS9nf_F1fC8pxQDd4fXJxFQd1Pyn8kLdZPhAzaeM7MmzNIuhY6w2eyQ7DeG/s1600/OEMA+RW35+EOSID.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgA0ZQnrVz_IcCQgWeOmXMchOazycGcb9OIawnbCThMuw139mqlrUGnOkgfRJSy0pJPtEALgNKCSo5bDgn54MS9nf_F1fC8pxQDd4fXJxFQd1Pyn8kLdZPhAzaeM7MmzNIuhY6w2eyQ7DeG/s400/OEMA+RW35+EOSID.JPG" width="247" /></a></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.200000762939453px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; margin-top: 0.4em;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.200000762939453px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; margin-top: 0.4em;">
We avoided the obstacle, but now we have 5 new obstacles along the turning takeoff path. It is depicted as red dot on the contour chart. These obstacles have a less gradient (ratio of height to distance) compared to the previous one. The list of new obstacles with its correction height due to turning is given below.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgTKTsoY1ixxTemFm5BPtOx79dRIKLuH9b931dBLPFV58lZrVPwbEmUzgWu_VKCNj9fWj3NxBty0fSwbZrKFjFQXXbfV-M6AVotrwsxYzwYTEB8jrOQ3cAiGX6YTHqWNUC9LWeON0WKbIVj/s1600/OEMA+RW35+EOSID+obstacles.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="123" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgTKTsoY1ixxTemFm5BPtOx79dRIKLuH9b931dBLPFV58lZrVPwbEmUzgWu_VKCNj9fWj3NxBty0fSwbZrKFjFQXXbfV-M6AVotrwsxYzwYTEB8jrOQ3cAiGX6YTHqWNUC9LWeON0WKbIVj/s400/OEMA+RW35+EOSID+obstacles.JPG" width="400" /></a></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.200000762939453px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; margin-top: 0.4em;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.200000762939453px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; margin-top: 0.4em;">
The new RTOW with EOSID successfully increases the MTOW to 240.4 ton. Now, the aircraft can takeoff with full load up to it's operational MTOW as 233 ton. The final RTOW is shown below.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjXWbl6-VsSb0dtLONQGVBriHttmT9eJIVN07Szo6fiizDrrL5hoPBNu8SFt9WOGntOhwUXvI9RGDhS7vWoCiVBLKq35Jp8yELUbclVCxlOnjoEjI9dbtHRYju9gNSFvxvcalDhwlGOu_Z2/s1600/OEMA+RTOW+RW35+EOSID.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="257" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjXWbl6-VsSb0dtLONQGVBriHttmT9eJIVN07Szo6fiizDrrL5hoPBNu8SFt9WOGntOhwUXvI9RGDhS7vWoCiVBLKq35Jp8yELUbclVCxlOnjoEjI9dbtHRYju9gNSFvxvcalDhwlGOu_Z2/s400/OEMA+RTOW+RW35+EOSID.JPG" width="400" /></a></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.200000762939453px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; margin-top: 0.4em;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.200000762939453px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; margin-top: 0.4em; text-align: center;">
-o0o-</div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.200000762939453px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; margin-top: 0.4em;">
<br /></div>
Neno Rusenohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04555009903444787356noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8672288207945788402.post-40902348161140871932012-02-28T01:28:00.000-08:002012-02-28T01:28:03.551-08:00VNKT - Kathmandu Airport EOSID DesignStep by steps of EOSID design for this airport with aircraft A320 is as follows:<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
1. Examine the required data for EOSID: airport/flight procedure data from AIP, terrain data, and aircraft data.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh7zgw8SmKzd9_qKkToCnNOv5XwYD2NYbM6ZfLbskRQSUwa2rNqKzZhnnMDZ0uSMC1lxEttjdK_QemRlPOjZst63CyYPEvZEbsy5CFeseGdvaiaCaDfsxED6aWA5Hw8lsQ_dqJtLD_0LpyF/s1600/Kathmandu+combined+view.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="150" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh7zgw8SmKzd9_qKkToCnNOv5XwYD2NYbM6ZfLbskRQSUwa2rNqKzZhnnMDZ0uSMC1lxEttjdK_QemRlPOjZst63CyYPEvZEbsy5CFeseGdvaiaCaDfsxED6aWA5Hw8lsQ_dqJtLD_0LpyF/s400/Kathmandu+combined+view.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Kathmandu airport is located in the valley surronds by mountanious area. The normal takeoff flight path crossing a high terrain area which requires a very high minimum climb gradient. The terrain and obstacle profile during a takeoff on runway 20 is given in the picture below. </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhXW3v4ves4VNfhfToq92Brw-LnISdznwskMYrAfrsN0aRHG9oc543h4QGc7jizq8iP68f7F0A9adIocCxI7Gywm6hH2PTc05z4Dch7uNoyfTdKdmwmxtcqg9BicycAcSUbNVTKnrkjrI_O/s1600/Kathmandu+takeoff+profile.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="110" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhXW3v4ves4VNfhfToq92Brw-LnISdznwskMYrAfrsN0aRHG9oc543h4QGc7jizq8iP68f7F0A9adIocCxI7Gywm6hH2PTc05z4Dch7uNoyfTdKdmwmxtcqg9BicycAcSUbNVTKnrkjrI_O/s400/Kathmandu+takeoff+profile.JPG" width="400" /></a></div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
2. MTOW comparison.</div>
<div>
The resulted RTOW chart gives MTOW of 59.4 tons for take off with CONF 1+F at 24 deg C OAT as shown below. This MTOW is too low compared to normal MTOW of 77 tons. Thus a EOSID procedure is required to get a higher MTOW.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgogeBqt7fsPbMFzcF3Ms7kEWIMNFyAYZov3_mcbuCo1RwCbUqSbFl4LNWxEgqg20VSAZLxqOT22WkiHCHddPV-NKzxVHy6yAvltkHYrYTDT8IjGJ7oVubvB7DDS_e-knXep4QAy8saZMZf/s1600/Kathmandu+RTOW+original.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="225" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgogeBqt7fsPbMFzcF3Ms7kEWIMNFyAYZov3_mcbuCo1RwCbUqSbFl4LNWxEgqg20VSAZLxqOT22WkiHCHddPV-NKzxVHy6yAvltkHYrYTDT8IjGJ7oVubvB7DDS_e-knXep4QAy8saZMZf/s400/Kathmandu+RTOW+original.JPG" width="400" /></a></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
3. EOSID procedure design.</div>
<div>
The EOSID design requires many aspects to be considered. The propossed procedure is climb on runway heading 022 deg to KTM, at D1 KTM RIGHT turn to intercept D4 KTM Arc, crossing R-015 KTM maintain 106 deg magnetic, at D5.7 KTM RIGHT turn to intercept R-106 KTM inbound to KTM, at KTM RIGHT turn to R-015 KTM to intercept D4 KTM Arc, crossing R-084 KTM LEFT turn to intercept R-106 to IGRIS. The pictorial of this procedure and it vertical profile are shown in picture below.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjL7bBbZ8Yq_9F_Onb6mb7Ek8tnKXH-KSL5qpejOugW2h01_rtbhC8Gt6mG_Z1NH9YqKImsIK6fH4abl2-jad7d4OOQYbh0fz1L0DsDMszVToqqBKuUmoccPhDBmxJXgFokuDUt4MIsAFOi/s1600/Kathmandu+EOSID.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjL7bBbZ8Yq_9F_Onb6mb7Ek8tnKXH-KSL5qpejOugW2h01_rtbhC8Gt6mG_Z1NH9YqKImsIK6fH4abl2-jad7d4OOQYbh0fz1L0DsDMszVToqqBKuUmoccPhDBmxJXgFokuDUt4MIsAFOi/s640/Kathmandu+EOSID.jpg" width="496" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: justify;">
4. Overlay propossed procedure into topographical map.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: justify;">
The 3D view of contour map with the EOSID procedure is shown in picture below.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh6AyQbdqlzOpH9Q6tEaYrHo5ylhjvvGFw9iXit3JM_1bEPl9Z8LFn2iWVAAX8jymXAUtKrp7fZLlh7TzNAK3xINtg5iAEKapBm1rdhF46iP0qgS8TuQW2mdQZX6lYDRAqi1qybvFvRczGP/s1600/Kathmandu+EOSID+terrain+3D.JPG" imageanchor="1"><img border="0" height="190" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh6AyQbdqlzOpH9Q6tEaYrHo5ylhjvvGFw9iXit3JM_1bEPl9Z8LFn2iWVAAX8jymXAUtKrp7fZLlh7TzNAK3xINtg5iAEKapBm1rdhF46iP0qgS8TuQW2mdQZX6lYDRAqi1qybvFvRczGP/s400/Kathmandu+EOSID+terrain+3D.JPG" width="400" /></a></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
5. Update obstacles data.</div>
<div>
The terrain and obstacles data along the procedure is used to generate a new RTOW chart based on EOSID. The obstacle used with its height correction is shown in table below.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgrXveXt5SSl8QsjZKTCIec__2_NmJxohMCAIsHXhVqHe2I55LpLjI2MXJcR3ytIJomERi_DTvUbuzNEYicZzL7JBAVOiQSiRwoeDePsjMIxAwzDc_mG8lizY4dXvfv4BYCCJkUbYMT795w/s1600/Kathmandu+obstacle+list.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="140" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgrXveXt5SSl8QsjZKTCIec__2_NmJxohMCAIsHXhVqHe2I55LpLjI2MXJcR3ytIJomERi_DTvUbuzNEYicZzL7JBAVOiQSiRwoeDePsjMIxAwzDc_mG8lizY4dXvfv4BYCCJkUbYMT795w/s400/Kathmandu+obstacle+list.JPG" width="400" /></a></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
6. New RTOW chart</div>
<div>
The new RTOW chart shows a significant increase in MTOW for the same setting as discussed previously. Now it gives MTOW of 68 tons.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh-IubEqncyL-qnw9NldlyQEcUnJm_z8IEZBpCzs7EwOe4zgBG2UMGV33P7HubCzQAmO8rYWM7HLHxZjuF0AzXu-vyMt0qTEjbGz4OvXvEQPkMGY0Ib7sZYgmkvB_FHAzNN9J-uW547Fbqc/s1600/Kathmandu+RTOW+EOSID.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="192" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh-IubEqncyL-qnw9NldlyQEcUnJm_z8IEZBpCzs7EwOe4zgBG2UMGV33P7HubCzQAmO8rYWM7HLHxZjuF0AzXu-vyMt0qTEjbGz4OvXvEQPkMGY0Ib7sZYgmkvB_FHAzNN9J-uW547Fbqc/s320/Kathmandu+RTOW+EOSID.JPG" width="320" /></a></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
7. Re-design EOSID to get a better RTOW chart if your boss is not satisfied.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
-o0o- </div>Neno Rusenohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04555009903444787356noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8672288207945788402.post-15517705485716673102012-02-22T20:33:00.000-08:002012-02-22T20:33:26.409-08:00EOSID Methods of Analysis<br />
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
The net takeoff
flightpath must clears all obstacles by either 35 feet vertically or
200 feet laterally inside the airport boundary, or 300 feet laterally
outside the airport boundary. To operate at the required lateral
clearance, the operator must account for factors that could cause a
difference between the intended and actual flightpaths and between
their corresponding ground tracks. For example, it cannot be assumed
that the ground track coincides with the extended runway centerline
without considering such factors as wind and available course
guidance (reference paragraph 14). This AC will focus on two
methods that may be used to identify and ensure clearance
of critical obstacles: the Area Analysis Method and Flight Track
Analysis Method.
</div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
The two methods may be
used in conjunction with each other on successive portions of the
analysis. For example, an operator may choose to use an area
analysis for the initial portion of the takeoff analysis,
followed by a flight track analysis, and then another area analysis.
</div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
a. The Area Analysis
Method defines an obstacle accountability area (OAA) within which all
obstacles must be cleared vertically. The OAA is centered on the
intended flight track and is Page 6 Par 8 5/5/06 AC 120-91
acceptable for use without accounting for factors that may affect the
actual flight track relative to the intended track, such as wind and
available course guidance.
</div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
b. The Flight Track
Analysis Method is an alternative means of defining an OAA based on
the navigational capabilities of the aircraft. This methodology
requires the operator to evaluate the effect of wind and available
course guidance on the actual ground track. While this method is
more complicated, it can result in an area smaller than the
OAA produced by the Area Analysis Method.
</div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
AREA ANALYSIS METHOD.
</div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiovx5aYR6aTSGLUrm2H1KfOJ-AHD2IGLE2DO1qgB92SpcjNAm15pZYwTqzSgthIgm6XTFXy9LdIUP9sD8nltDl7MVwJzGWPszZxvJOXBNBt4XHAZPhgN9-nj9gWZu_HQXT5WnKD7TFZ4Hf/s1600/EO+flightpath+splay.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="205" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiovx5aYR6aTSGLUrm2H1KfOJ-AHD2IGLE2DO1qgB92SpcjNAm15pZYwTqzSgthIgm6XTFXy9LdIUP9sD8nltDl7MVwJzGWPszZxvJOXBNBt4XHAZPhgN9-nj9gWZu_HQXT5WnKD7TFZ4Hf/s320/EO+flightpath+splay.jpg" width="320" /></a>a. During straight-out
departures or when the intended track or airplane heading is within
15 degrees of the extended runway centerline heading, the following
criteria apply:
</div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
(1) The width of the OAA
is 0.0625D feet on each side of the intended track (where D is the
distance along the intended flightpath from the end of the
runway in feet), except when
</div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
limited by the following
minimum and maximum widths.
</div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
(2) The minimum width of
the OAA is 200 feet on each side of the intended track within the
airport boundaries, and 300 feet on each side of the
intended track outside the airport boundaries.
</div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
(3) The maximum width of
the OAA is 2,000 feet on each side of the intended track.</div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
b. During departures
involving turns of the intended track or when the airplane heading is
more than 15 degrees from the extended runway centerline heading, the
following criteria apply:
</div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
(1) The initial straight
segment, if any, has the same width as a straight-out departure.
</div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
(2) The width of the OAA
at the beginning of the turning segment is the greater of:
</div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
(a) 300 feet on each side
of the intended track.
</div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
(b) The width of the OAA
at the end of the initial straight segment, if there is one.
</div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
(c) The width of the
end of the immediately preceding segment, if there is one,
analyzed by the Flight Track Analysis Method.
</div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
(3) Thereafter in
straight or turning segments, the width of the OAA increases
by 0.125D feet on each side of the intended track (where D
is the distance along the intended flightpath from the
beginning of the first turning segment in feet), except when limited
by the following maximum width:
</div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
(4) The maximum width
of the OAA is 3,000 feet on each side of the intended
track.
</div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
c. The following apply
to all departures analyzed with the Area Analysis Method:
</div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
(1) A single intended
track may be used for analysis if it is representative of operational
procedures. For turning departures, this implies the bank
angle is varied to keep a constant turning radius with varying
speeds.
</div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
(2) Multiple intended
tracks may be accommodated in one area analysis by
increasing the OAA width accordingly. In a turn, the specified OAA
half-widths (i.e., one-half of the OAA maximum width) should be
applied to the inside of the minimum turn radius and the outside of
the maximum turn radius. An average turn radius may be used to
calculate distances along the track.
</div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
(3) The distance to an
obstacle within the OAA should be measured along the intended track
to a point abeam the obstacle.
</div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
(4) When an operator
uses the Area Analysis Method, the operator does not need
to separately account for crosswind, instrument error, or flight
technical error within the OAA.
</div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
(5) Obstacles prior to
the end of the runway need not be accounted for, unless a turn is
made prior to the end of the runway.
</div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
(6) One or more turns of
less than 15 degrees each, with an algebraic sum of not more than a
15 degree change in heading or track, may be analyzed as a
straight-out departure.
</div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
(7) No accountability is
needed for the radius of the turn or gradient loss in the turn for a
turn with a 15 degree or less change in heading or track.
</div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
FLIGHT TRACK ANALYSIS
METHOD.
</div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
The Flight Track
Analysis Method involves analyzing the ground track of the
flightpath. This paragraph discusses factors that the operator must
consider in performing a Flight Track Analysis.
</div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
a. Pilotage in Turns.
</div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
The operator should
consider the ability of a pilot to initiate and maintain a
desired speed and bank angle in a turn. Assumptions used here should
be consistent with pilot training and qualification programs.
</div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
b. Winds.
</div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
(1) When using the
Flight Track Analysis Method while course guidance is not
available, operators should take into account winds that may cause
the airplane to drift off the intended track.
</div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
(2) The operator should
take into account the effect of wind on the takeoff flightpath, in
addition to making the headwind and tailwind component corrections to
the takeoff gross weight used in a straight-out departure.
</div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
(3) When assessing the
effect of wind on a turn, the wind may be held constant
in velocity and direction throughout the analysis unless known local
weather phenomena indicate otherwise.
</div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
(4) If wind gradient
information is available near the airport and flightpath (e.g., wind
reports in mountainous areas adjacent to the flightpath), the
operator should take that information into account in the development
of a procedure. </div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; text-align: center;">
-o0o-</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Source: AC No: 120-91 Airport Obstacle Analysis</div>Neno Rusenohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04555009903444787356noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8672288207945788402.post-47477733593634550762012-02-20T19:24:00.001-08:002012-02-20T19:33:30.509-08:00EOSID Requirements<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgW8QT5-mCBqW7bdv282xjPigWtVwpwgBgArHOEReu12awlSbrrcSrQ7h_cG0Spw2pjk2OFNImWejaDmqoqDsgd23aM56JdFEYscp5YvLbtdSSvHZSoD6kTS02flBhGaNq_gsGIzxWWTWZH/s1600/EO+takeoff+segments.jpg" style="font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 100%; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; "><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 251px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgW8QT5-mCBqW7bdv282xjPigWtVwpwgBgArHOEReu12awlSbrrcSrQ7h_cG0Spw2pjk2OFNImWejaDmqoqDsgd23aM56JdFEYscp5YvLbtdSSvHZSoD6kTS02flBhGaNq_gsGIzxWWTWZH/s400/EO+takeoff+segments.jpg" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5711424822709364082" /></a><p align="JUSTIFY" style="font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 100%; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0in; ">For aircraft operating above 5700 kg and in accordance with CASA CAO 20.7.1B, operators must comply with paragraph 14 of the order for the development of takeoff performance data and procedures. Sub-paragraph 14.2, states: </p> <p align="JUSTIFY" style="font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 100%; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0in; "><span style="font-size: 100%; text-align: left; ">“ Procedures to be followed consistent with this Order, including procedures anticipating engine failure at any time between the commencement of take-off and completion of landing, must be specified in the Operator’s Operation Manual. The procedures so specified must be such that they can be consistently executed in service by flight crews of average skill and they must also be such that the take-off flight path with all engines operating is above the one-engine inoperative take-off flight path.” </span></p><p align="JUSTIFY" style="font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 100%; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0in; "></p><p align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in">The takeoff flight path in the context of this guidance and for the purpose of defining the path requirements for an EOSID is as noted below: </p> <p align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in"><span style="font-size: 100%; text-align: left; ">The EOSID by definition must commence from a time where engine failure has occurred and where the flight crew are committed to a continued takeoff with one engine out. The takeoff flight path of the EOSID should be able to join a suitable en route path to the planned destination or to another suitable airport or at least have a holding pattern at the end of the EOSID.</span></p> <p align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in">The aircraft is considered to be enroute when it is at the higher attitude of 1500 feet: </p> <p align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in"><span style="font-size: 100%; text-align: left; ">CAO 20.7.1b Para 12.6</span></p> <p align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in">”The net flight path in the en-route configurations must have a positive slope at 1500 feet above the aerodrome where a landing is assumed to be made following engine failure. …” </p> <p align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in"><span style="font-size: 100%; text-align: left; ">or the altitude where 1000 feet enroute obstacle occurs</span></p> <p align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in"><span style="font-size: 100%; text-align: left; ">CAO 20.7.1b Para 12.4</span></p> <p align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in">“…the en-route obstacle clearance requirements are met if the en-route configuration with a critical engine inoperative the net flight path of an aircraft under V.M.C. clears by 1 000 feet vertically all obstacles within 5 nautical miles of the aeroplane’s track or, under I.M.C., by such greater distance as is determined by the accuracy of the navigation aid(s) used. “</p> <p align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in"><span style="font-size: 100%; text-align: left; ">Operationally alternative options are normally considered. This may include climbing to either a minimum safe altitude (MSA), a minimum vectoring altitude (MVA), or a fix and altitude, from which an approach may be initiated to the departure airport or departure alternate. Operators should note that the end of the takeoff flight path is determined by the aircraft’s gross flight path but the obstacle analysis must use the net flight path data. </span></p><p></p><p align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; "></p><p align="JUSTIFY" style="font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 100%; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0in; ">The takeoff path extends from a standing start to a point, at which the aircraft is at a height of 1500 ft above the takeoff surface, or at which the transition from the takeoff to the en-route configuration is completed and the final takeoff speed is reached, whichever point is higher. </p> <p align="JUSTIFY" style="font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 100%; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0in; "><span style="font-size: 100%; text-align: left; ">JAR/ FAR 25.111 Takeoff path.</span></p> <p align="JUSTIFY" style="font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 100%; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0in; ">“The takeoff path extends from a standing start to a point in the takeoff at which the airplane is 1,500 feet above the takeoff surface, or at which the transition from the takeoff to the en route configuration is completed and V FTO is reached whichever point is higher.” </p> <p align="JUSTIFY" style="font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 100%; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0in; "><span style="font-size: 100%; text-align: left; ">CASA accepts the certification of aircraft as detailed in the Aircraft Flight Manual (AFM), however the operational rules of CAO 20.7.1B must be considered in the analysis. If there is any conflict between the AFM data and the operating rules, then if the AFM is more restrictive, that is what must be used. The takeoff path definition assumes that the aircraft is accelerated on the ground to VEF, at which point the critical engine is made inoperative and remains inoperative for the rest of the takeoff. Moreover, the V2 speed must be reached by 35 feet 1 above the takeoff surface (this point is also known as reference zero).</span></p> <p align="JUSTIFY" style="font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 100%; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0in; "><span style="font-size: 100%; text-align: left; ">The aircraft must continue at a speed not less than V2 and achieve the regulatory climb and any obstacle clearance requirements until the aircraft reaches the acceleration altitude. The minimum height is 400 feet above the takeoff surface; however operators may select a higher altitude.</span></p> <p align="JUSTIFY" style="font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 100%; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0in; "><span style="font-size: 100%; text-align: left; ">This path is a certification requirement and the certification standard is accepted by CASA. The related performance data is contained in the Aircraft Flight Manual (AFM). </span></p><p align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; "></p><p align="JUSTIFY" style="font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 100%; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0in; ">Most of the time, runways have surrounding obstacles which should be taken into account prior to takeoff, to ascertain that the aircraft is able to clear them. A vertical margin has to be considered between the aircraft and each obstacle in the takeoff flight path. This margin, based on a climb gradient reduction, leads to the definitions of the Gross Takeoff Flight Path and the Net takeoff flight Path. </p> <p align="JUSTIFY" style="font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 100%; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0in; "><span style="font-size: 100%; text-align: left; ">Gross Flight Path = Takeoff flight path actually flown by the aircraft, based upon the gross height attained. The flight path commences at reference zero.</span></p> <p align="JUSTIFY" style="font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 100%; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0in; ">Net Flight Path = Gross takeoff flight path minus a mandatory reduction, based upon the net height attained. </p> <p align="JUSTIFY" style="font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 100%; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0in; "><span style="font-size: 100%; text-align: left; ">The gradient reduction is considered to account for pilot technique, degraded aircraft performance, and ambient conditions. The net takeoff flight path data must be determined so that they represent the actual (Gross) takeoff flight path reduced at each point by a gradient equal to:</span></p> <p align="JUSTIFY" style="font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 100%; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0in; ">0.8% for two-engine aircraft </p> <p align="JUSTIFY" style="font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 100%; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0in; ">0.9% for three-engine aircraft </p> <p align="JUSTIFY" style="font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 100%; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0in; ">1.0% for four-engine aircraft </p> <p align="JUSTIFY" style="font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 100%; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0in; "><span style="font-size: 100%; text-align: left; ">CAO 20.7.1B Para 7.5</span></p> <p align="JUSTIFY" style="font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 100%; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0in; "> “In determining the net flight path of an aeroplane to show compliance with subsection 12, the gross gradients of climb achieved in paragraphs 7.2 and 7.4 must be reduced by 0.8% for twin-engined aeroplanes, 0.9% for three-engined aeroplanes and 1.0% for four-engined aeroplanes.” </p><p align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; "></p><p align="JUSTIFY" style="font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 100%; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0in; ">The takeoff flight path can be divided into several segments. Each segment is characteristic of a distinct change in configuration, thrust, and speed. Moreover, the configuration, weight, and thrust of the aircraft must correspond to the most critical condition prevailing in the segment. Finally, the flight path must be based on the aircraft’s performance without ground effect. As a general rule, the aircraft is considered to be out of the ground effect, when it reaches a height equal to its wing span. </p> <p align="JUSTIFY" style="font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 100%; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0in; "><span style="font-size: 100%; text-align: left; ">After an engine failure at VEF, whatever the operational conditions, the aircraft must fulfill minimum climb gradients, as required by the aircraft flight manual and the operational requirements of CAO 20.7.1B.</span></p> <p align="JUSTIFY" style="font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 100%; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0in; ">Figure above, summarizes the different requirements and aircraft configuration during the four takeoff segments. This includes the minimum required climb gradient with an engine out, flaps / slats configuration, engine power rating, speed reference, and landing gear configuration. </p><p align="JUSTIFY" style="font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 100%; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; text-align: center; margin-bottom: 0in; ">--o0o--</p><p align="JUSTIFY" style="font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 100%; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0in; ">Source: </p><p align="JUSTIFY" style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0in; "><span >CAAP 235-4(0): Engine Out SID (EOSID) and Engine Out Missed Approach Procedures </span></p><p></p><p></p><p></p>Neno Rusenohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04555009903444787356noreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8672288207945788402.post-53040900964946916242012-02-20T17:58:00.000-08:002012-02-20T18:20:09.706-08:00Introduction to EOSID<p style="text-align: justify;margin-bottom: 0in; "></p><p style="text-align: justify;margin-bottom: 0in; ">Engine out takeoff guidance has a number of names as adopted by industry, some of the common names include: </p> <p style="text-align: justify;margin-bottom: 0in; ">1. Engine Out Departure Procedures </p> <p style="text-align: justify;margin-bottom: 0in; ">2. Engine Out Contingency Procedures </p> <p style="text-align: justify;margin-bottom: 0in; ">3. Engine Out Escape Paths </p> <p style="text-align: justify;margin-bottom: 0in; ">4. Engine Out SIDs </p> <p style="text-align: justify;margin-bottom: 0in; ">The name selected is optional but it must reflect the approved kind of operation of the aircraft. Items 1, 2 and 3 can make reference to both VMC and IMC operations and must have the appropriate guidance for the operation type. Item 4, as the name suggests is based on IMC operations. Although not a requirement of CAO 20.7.1B, the majority of the aircraft that operate to this CAO are IFR approved. For IFR approved aircraft an EOSID must cover takeoffs in both VMC and IMC. From this point forward engine out takeoff guidance will be referred to as an EOSID.</p><p align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in">Standard Instrument Departures (SIDs) or departure procedures (DPs) are designed in accordance with U.S. Standards for Terminal Instrument Procedures (TERPS) or ICAO Pans-Ops. These are based on normal all-engine operations and assume that the aircraft are capable of maintaining a climb profile. These departure procedures are normally published as specific routes to be followed or as omni-directional departures, together with procedure design gradients and details of significant obstacles. They are normally established for each runway where instrument departures are expected to be used and they define a departure procedure for the various categories of aircraft used. </p> <p align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in"><span style="font-size: 100%; text-align: left; ">In the event of an engine failure, continued adherence to departure procedures may not be possible as SIDs or DPs do not necessarily assure that engine-out obstacle clearance requirements are met. An engine failure during takeoff is a non-normal condition, and therefore, takes precedence over noise abatement, air traffic, SID’s, DPs, and other normal operating considerations. The fundamental difference between SIDs and EOSIDs is that SIDs provides the minimum performance considerations to meet the departure requirements assuming an all engine operation whereas EOSIDs are based upon engine out performance in relation to obstacle clearance. EOSIDs can be in the form of a straight departure and or a series of turns.</span></p> <p align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in"> </p> <p align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in">Note: Development of Engine Out Takeoff Procedures is the responsibility of the operator. </p> <p align="JUSTIFY" style="text-align: center;margin-bottom: 0in; ">--o0o--</p><p align="JUSTIFY" style="text-align: justify;margin-bottom: 0in; ">Source: </p><p align="JUSTIFY" style="text-align: justify;margin-bottom: 0in; ">CAAP 235-4(0): Engine Out SID (EOSID) and Engine Out Missed Approach Procedures</p><p style="margin-bottom: 0in"> </p><p></p>Neno Rusenohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04555009903444787356noreply@blogger.com0